[EpiData-list] Display format
epidata-list at lists.umanitoba.ca
epidata-list at lists.umanitoba.ca
Thu Dec 1 22:28:45 CST 2005
This is a question/comment for the folk at EpiData.
Much of the data here is entered in EpiData and then analysed in
Stata. I've noticed that in Stata the display format for a field is the
same as the data entry format in EpiData. For example if the field
"smoke" (0=no, 1=yes) has the field type set to # in EpiData, in Stata the
display format is %1.0f. This can cause confusion with Stata commands that
base the display format of their output on the display format of the field,
e.g. the Stata command "ci".
If I type the following into Stata:
ci smoke, binomial
The output I get looks like this:
Variable | Obs Mean Std. Err. [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+---------------------------------------------------------------
sex | 44 0 0 0 0
because the mean, SE, and CI have been rounded to the nearest integer.
Is it necessary for the output/exported format of fields to be the same as
the data entry format? Can numeric fields be exported with a format of at
least 9.0g?
Cheers,
Suzanna
Suzanna Vidmar
Research Fellow
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit
Royal Children's Hospital
Flemington Rd
Parkville Victoria 3052
telephone: +61 3 9345 6372
facsimile: +61 3 9345 6000
More information about the EpiData-list
mailing list